Advisory committee meetings are held once every year (or twice every year, if the student or the committee chooses to do so) to asses the progress of a grad student’s PhD thesis. The meeting involves a written report that is to be submitted to the committee a week prior to the meeting and an oral presentation on the D-Day. During the presentation, the validity of the research work is thoroughly discussed along with the future direction(s) of the project(s) being undertaken. The advisory committee meetings are extremely important for the successful advancement and completion of a thesis – it is where brutal yet honest feedback is conveyed. We as grad students are forced to think critically of our work and defend our hypotheses as well as our results.
My first advisory committee meeting was an intense two-hour long session on a rather dull Tuesday afternoon. As I explained the premise of my work and my goals for the next year, my committee members brought up important questions that I had not previously ever considered. All the members of my committee, including my advisor, were supportive and encouraging. I learned some valuable lessons from the entire experience and got some great feedback from everyone. Some interesting and important points highlighted in my feedback assessment were –
- Think carefully about how to present data and set up an argument in my presentation.
- Work on clearly identifying the premise that sets the stage for my hypotheses.
- Be critical about my data.
- Continue to read literature: more reading, and reading more critically.
- Focus on developing more robust immunological assays to answer the questions in my aims.
- Interact more with colleagues on campus and at other schools to learn and get insight into techniques and relevant assays (wrt understanding what works and what doesn’t).
- Explaining the experiments in detail before delving into my results (every assay is unique and has a question to be answered).
- Think about how I want to present the previous studies done in the field that are relevant to my questions.
- My hypotheses should be provided with a context (what is the data in support or against my hypotheses?)
These were just some of the significant parts of the feedback that I received. Now it’s time to put these into action and definitely work on continuing to build on my project more confidently. More later.